🌐 AI搜索 & 代理 主页
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in
Menu
Find a journal Publish with us Track your research
Search
Saved research
Cart
  1. Home
  2. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
  3. Article

Time (also) flies from left to right

  • Brief Reports
  • Published: June 2007
  • Volume 14, pages 512–516, (2007)
  • Cite this article
Download PDF
View saved research
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript
Time (also) flies from left to right
Download PDF
  • Julio Santiago1,
  • Juan Lupáñez1,
  • Elvira Pérez1 &
  • …
  • María Jesús Funes1 
  • 6106 Accesses

  • 334 Citations

  • 5 Altmetric

  • Explore all metrics

Abstract

Everyday linguistic expressions in many languages suggest that back and front space is projected onto temporal concepts of past and future (as in the sentencewe are years ahead of them). The present experiment tested the psychological reality of a different space-time conceptual metaphor—projecting the past to left space and the future to right space—for which there are no linguistic traces in any language. Participants categorized words as referring to the past or to the future. Irrelevant to this task, words appeared either to the left or right of the screen, and responses were given by keypresses of the left or right hand. Judgments were facilitated when word position and response mapping were congruent with the left-past right-future conceptual metaphor. These results are discussed in the context of current claims about the embodiment of meaning and the possible mechanisms by which conceptual metaphors can be acquired.

Article PDF

Download to read the full article text

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, books and news in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Cognition
  • Cognitive Science
  • Conceptual Analysis
  • Embodiment
  • Semantic Memory

References

  • Alverson, H. (1994).Semantics and experience: Universal metaphors of time in English, Mandarin, Hindi, and Sesotho. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boroditsky, L. (2000). Metaphoric structuring: Understanding time through spatial metaphors.Cognition,75, 1–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boroditsky, L. (2001). Does language shape thought? Mandarin and English speakers’ conceptions of time.Cognitive Psychology,43, 1–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boroditsky, L., &Ramscar, M. (2002). The roles of body and mind in abstract thought.Psychological Science,13, 185–189.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Casasanto, D., Boroditsky, L., Phillips, W., Greene J., Goswami, S., Bocanegra-Thiel, S., et al. (2004). How deep are effects of language on thought? Time estimation in speakers of English, Indonesian, Greek, and Spanish. In K. Forbus, D. Gentner, & T. Regier (Eds.),Proceedings of the 26th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 186–191). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee, A., Maher, L. M., Gonzalez-Rothi, L., &Heilman, K. M. (1995). Asyntactic thematic role assignment: The use of a temporal-spatial strategy.Brain & Language,49, 125–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee, A., Southwood, M. H., &Basilico, D. (1999). Verbs, events and spatial representations.Neuropsychologia,37, 395–402.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, H. H. (1973). Space, time, semantics and the child. In T. E. Moore (Ed.),Cognitive development and the acquisition of language. (pp. 27–63). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dehaene, S., Bossini, S., &Giraux, P. (1993). The mental representation of parity and number magnitude.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,122, 371–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emmorey, K. (2001). Space on hand: The exploitation of signing space to illustrate abstract thought. In M. Gattis (Ed.),Spatial schemas and abstract thought (pp. 147–174). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gevers, W., Reynvoet, B., &Fias, W. (2003). The mental representation of ordinal sequences is spatially organized.Cognition,87, B87-B95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gevers, W., Reynvoet, B., &Fias, W. (2004). The mental representation of ordinal sequences is spatially organized: Evidence from days of the week.Cortex,40, 171–172.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. (1987).The body in the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, H. (1987). Time in Toba.Word,38, 173–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G. &Johnson, M. (1980).Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G., &Johnson, M. (1999).Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, R. (1997).A geography of time. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maas, A., &Russo, A. (2003). Directional bias in the mental representation of spatial events: Nature or culture?Psychological Science,14, 296–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maher, L. M., Chatterjee, A., Gonzalez-Rothi, L., &Heilman, K. M. (1995). Agrammatic sentence production: The use of a temporal-spatial strategy.Brain & Language,49, 105–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malotki, E. (1983).Hopi time: A linguistic analysis of temporal concepts in the Hopi language. Berlin: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandler, J. M. (1992). How to build a baby: II. Conceptual primitives.Psychological Review,99, 587–604.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mapelli, D., Rusconi, E., &Umiltà, C. (2003). The SNARC effect: An instance of the Simon effect?Cognition,88, B1-B10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McGlone, M. S., &Harding, J. L. (1998). Back (or forward?) to the future: The role of perspective in temporal language comprehension.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,24, 1211–1223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Núñez, R. E., &Sweetser, E. (2006). With the future behind them: Convergent evidence from Aymara language and gesture in the crosslinguistic comparison of spatial construals of time.Cognitive Science,30, 401–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Özçaliskan, S. (2003). Metaphorical motion in crosslinguistic perspective: A comparison of English and Turkish.Metaphor & Symbol,18, 189–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radden, G. (2004). The metaphor TIME AS SPACE across languages. In N. Baumgarten et al. (Eds.),Übersetzen, interkulturelle Kommunikation, Spracherwerb und Sprachvermittlung—Das Leben mit Mehreren Sprachen: Festschrift für Juliane House zum 60. Geburtstag (pp. 225–238). Bochum: Aks-verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rakova, M. (2002). The philosophy of embodied realism: A high price to pay?Cognitive Linguistics,13, 215–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santiago, J., Román, A., & Oullet, M. (2007).Conceptual metaphors and cognitive flexibility: A review and a theory. Manuscript in preparation.

  • Schneider, W. (1988). Micro Experimental Laboratory: An integrated system for IBM PC compatibles.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, &Computers,20, 206–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slobin, D. (1996). From “thought and language” to “thinking for speaking.” In J. J. Gumperz, & S. C. Levinson (Eds.),Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp. 70–96). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torralbo, A., Santiago, J., &Lupiáñez, J. (2006). Flexible conceptual projection of time onto spatial frames of reference.Cognitive Science,30, 745–757.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, B., Kugelmass, S., &Winter, A. (1991). Cross-cultural and developmental trends in graphic productions.Cognitive Psychology,23, 515–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, N. (1998).The contemporary theory of metaphor: A perspective from Chinese. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zebian, S. (2005). Linkages between number concepts, spatial thinking, and directionality of writing: The SNARC effect and the reverse SNARC effect in English and Arabic monoliterates, biliterates, and illiterate Arabic speakers.Journal of Cognition & Culture,5, 165–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dept. de Psicología, Universidad de Granada, Campus de Cartuja, Granada, Spain

    Julio Santiago, Juan Lupáñez, Elvira Pérez & María Jesús Funes

Authors
  1. Julio Santiago
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Juan Lupáñez
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Elvira Pérez
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. María Jesús Funes
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julio Santiago.

Additional information

The authors are indebted to Antonio Román, Nieves Rodríguez, and Ouafa Bouachra for running the experiment and being such enthusiastic students.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Santiago, J., Lupáñez, J., Pérez, E. et al. Time (also) flies from left to right. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 14, 512–516 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194099

Download citation

  • Received: 30 March 2006

  • Accepted: 10 July 2006

  • Issue date: June 2007

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194099

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Simon Effect
  • Conceptual Metaphor
  • SNARC Effect
  • Cognitive Linguistic
  • Spatial Metaphor

Advertisement

Search

Navigation

  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Books A-Z

Publish with us

  • Journal finder
  • Publish your research
  • Language editing
  • Open access publishing

Products and services

  • Our products
  • Librarians
  • Societies
  • Partners and advertisers

Our brands

  • Springer
  • Nature Portfolio
  • BMC
  • Palgrave Macmillan
  • Apress
  • Discover
  • Your US state privacy rights
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Help and support
  • Legal notice
  • Cancel contracts here

35.236.159.232

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature