Remove obsolete comment

petere · petere · commit 83d8065b1f74 · 2024-03-22T07:20:11.000+01:00
The idea to use a union in the definition of RangeTblEntry is clearly not being pursued. Reviewed-by: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/4b27fc50-8cd6-46f5-ab20-88dbaadca645@eisentraut.org
diff --git a/src/include/nodes/parsenodes.h b/src/include/nodes/parsenodes.h
@@ -1029,12 +1029,6 @@ typedef struct RangeTblEntry
 
 	RTEKind		rtekind;		/* see above */
 
-	/*
-	 * XXX the fields applicable to only some rte kinds should be merged into
-	 * a union.  I didn't do this yet because the diffs would impact a lot of
-	 * code that is being actively worked on.  FIXME someday.
-	 */
-
 	/*
 	 * Fields valid for a plain relation RTE (else zero):
 	 *
