@@ -9348,9 +9348,11 @@ SELECT EXTRACT(DOY FROM TIMESTAMP '2001-02-16 20:38:40');
93489348 <listitem>
93499349 <para>
93509350 For <type>timestamp with time zone</type> values, the
9351- number of seconds since 1970-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (can be negative);
9351+ number of seconds since 1970-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (negative for
9352+ timestamps before that);
93529353 for <type>date</type> and <type>timestamp</type> values, the
9353- number of seconds since 1970-01-01 00:00:00 local time;
9354+ nominal number of seconds since 1970-01-01 00:00:00,
9355+ without regard to timezone or daylight-savings rules;
93549356 for <type>interval</type> values, the total number
93559357 of seconds in the interval
93569358 </para>
@@ -9359,18 +9361,29 @@ SELECT EXTRACT(DOY FROM TIMESTAMP '2001-02-16 20:38:40');
93599361SELECT EXTRACT(EPOCH FROM TIMESTAMP WITH TIME ZONE '2001-02-16 20:38:40.12-08');
93609362<lineannotation>Result: </lineannotation><computeroutput>982384720.12</computeroutput>
93619363
9364+ SELECT EXTRACT(EPOCH FROM TIMESTAMP '2001-02-16 20:38:40.12');
9365+ <lineannotation>Result: </lineannotation><computeroutput>982355920.12</computeroutput>
9366+
93629367SELECT EXTRACT(EPOCH FROM INTERVAL '5 days 3 hours');
93639368<lineannotation>Result: </lineannotation><computeroutput>442800</computeroutput>
93649369</screen>
93659370
93669371 <para>
9367- You can convert an epoch value back to a time stamp
9372+ You can convert an epoch value back to a <type>timestamp with time zone</type>
93689373 with <function>to_timestamp</function>:
93699374 </para>
93709375<screen>
93719376SELECT to_timestamp(982384720.12);
93729377<lineannotation>Result: </lineannotation><computeroutput>2001-02-17 04:38:40.12+00</computeroutput>
93739378</screen>
9379+
9380+ <para>
9381+ Beware that applying <function>to_timestamp</function> to an epoch
9382+ extracted from a <type>date</type> or <type>timestamp</type> value
9383+ could produce a misleading result: the result will effectively
9384+ assume that the original value had been given in UTC, which might
9385+ not be the case.
9386+ </para>
93749387 </listitem>
93759388 </varlistentry>
93769389
0 commit comments