🌐 AI搜索 & 代理 主页
Skip to main content
Log in

Evidence supporting performance measures of laparoscopic appendectomy through a novel surgical proficiency assessment tool and low-cost laparoscopic training system

  • 2023 SAGES Oral
  • Published:
Save article
View saved research
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic training remains inaccessible for surgeons in low- and middle-income countries, limiting its widespread adoption. We developed a novel tool for assessment of laparoscopic appendectomy skills through ALL-SAFE, a low-cost laparoscopy training system.

Methods

This pilot study in Ethiopia, Cameroon, and the USA assessed appendectomy skills using the ALL-SAFE training system. Performance measures were captured using the ALL-SAFE verification of proficiency tool (APPY-VOP), consisting of a checklist, modified Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (m-OSATS), and final rating. Twenty participants, including novice (n = 11), intermediate (n = 8), and expert (n = 1), completed an online module covering appendicitis management and psychomotor skills in laparoscopic appendectomy. After viewing an expert skills demonstration video, participants recorded their performance within ALL-SAFE. Using the APPY-VOP, participants rated their own and three peer videos. We used the Kruskal–Wallis test and a Many-Facet Rasch Model to evaluate (i) capacity of APPY-VOP to differentiate performance levels, (ii) correlation among three APPY-VOP components, and (iii) rating differences across groups.

Results

Checklist scores increased from novice (M = 21.02) to intermediate (M = 23.64) and expert (M = 28.25), with differentiation between experts and novices, P = 0.005. All five m-OSATS domains and global summed, total summed, and final rating discriminated across all performance levels (P < 0.001). APPY-VOP final ratings adequately discriminated Competent (M = 2.0), Borderline (N = 1.8), and Not Competent (M = 1.4) performances, Χ2 (2,85) = 32.3, P = 0.001. There was a positive correlation between ALL-SAFE checklist and m-OSATS summed scores, r(83) = 0.63, P < 0.001. Comparison of ratings suggested no differences across expertise levels (P = 0.69) or location (P = 0.66).

Conclusion

APPY-VOP effectively discriminated between novice and expert performance in laparoscopic appendectomy skills in a simulated setting. Scoring alignment across raters suggests consistent evaluation, independent of expertise. These results support the use of APPY-VOP among all skill levels inside a peer rating system. Future studies will focus on correlating proficiency to clinical practice and scaling ALL-SAFE to other settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from €37.37 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Taiwan (R.O.C.))

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Meara JG, Greenberg SL (2015) The Lancet Commission on Global Surgery Global surgery 2030: evidence and solutions for achieving health, welfare and economic development. Surgery 157(5):834–835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2015.02.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (2020) Appendicitis—level 3 cause. https://www.healthdata.org/results/gbd_summaries/2019/appendicitis-level-3-cause. Accessed 23 Nov 2022

  3. Rosenbaum AJ, Maine RG (2019) Improving access to laparoscopy in low-resource settings. Ann Glob Health 85(1):114. https://doi.org/10.5334/aogh.2573

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Wilkinson E, Aruparayil N, Gnanaraj J, Brown J, Jayne D (2021) Barriers to training in laparoscopic surgery in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review. Trop Dr 51(3):408–414. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049475521998186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Choy I, Kitto S, Adu-Aryee N, Okrainec A (2013) Barriers to the uptake of laparoscopic surgery in a lower-middle-income country. Surg Endosc 27(11):4009–4015. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3019-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bentounsi Z, Nazir A (2020) Building global surgical workforce capacity through academic partnerships. J Public Health Emerg. https://doi.org/10.21037/jphe-20-88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kang MJ, Apea-Kubi KB, Apea-Kubi KAK, Adoula NG, Odonkor JNN, Ogoe AK (2020) Establishing a sustainable training program for laparoscopy in resource-limited settings: experience in Ghana. Ann Glob Health 86(1):89. https://doi.org/10.5334/aogh.2957

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. HarveyL CH, Grimm B, Lovett B, Ulysse JC, Sizemore C (2020) Experience with a novel laparoscopic gynecologic curriculum in Haiti: lessons in implementation. Surg Endosc 34(5):2035–2039. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06983-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chao TE, MandigoM O-A, Maine R (2016) Systematic review of laparoscopic surgery in low- and middle-income countries: benefits, challenges, and strategies. Surg Endosc 30(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4201-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lukish JR, Ellis-Davy J (2022) A novel low cost minimally invasive surgical system allows for the translation of modern pediatric surgical technology to low- and middle-income nations. J Pediatr Surg 57(6):1099–1103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2022.01.027

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rooney DM, Mott NM, Ryder CY, Snell MJ, Ngam BN, Barnard ML, Jeffcoach DR, Kim GJ (2022) Evidence supporting performance measures of laparoscopic salpingostomy using novel low-cost ectopic pregnancy simulator. Glob Surg Educ 1:41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44186-022-00044-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Martin JA, Regehr G, Reznick R, MacRae H, Murnaghan J, Hutchison C, Brown M (1997) Objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) for surgical residents. Br J Surg 84(2):273–278. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2168.1997.02502.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. American College of Surgeons and Association of Program Directors in Surgery (2017) ACS/APDS surgery resident skills curriculum—phase 2. https://www.facs.org/for-medical-professionals/education/programs/acs-apds-surgery-resident-skills-curriculum/. Accessed 15 Mar 2023

  14. Sheahan G, Reznick R, Klinger D, Flynn L, Zevin B (2019) Comparison of faculty versus structured peer-feedback for acquisitions of basic and intermediate-level surgical skills. Am J Surg 217(2):214–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.06.028

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Vaughn CJ, Kim E, O’Sullivan P, Huang E, Lin MY, Wyles S, Palmer BJ, Pierce JL, Chern H (2016) Peer video review and feedback improve performance in basic surgical skills. Am J Surg 211(2):355–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.08.034

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lin J, Reddy RM (2019) Teaching, mentorship, and coaching in surgical education. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 29(3):311–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.thorsurg.2019.03.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Daniel R, McKechnie T, Kruse CC, Levin M, Lee Y, Doumouras AG, Hong D, Eskicioglu C (2022) Video-based coaching for surgical residents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09379-4

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Robertson F, Mutabazi Z, Kyamanywa P, Ntakiyiruta G, Musafiri S, Walker T, Kayibanda E, Mukabatsinda C, Scott J, Costas-Chavarri A (2019) Laparoscopy in Rwanda: a national assessment of utilization, demands, and perceived challenges. World J Surg 43(2):339–345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-018-4797-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kumins NH, Qin VL, Driscoll EC, Morrow KL, Kashyap VS, Ning AY, Tucker NJ, King AH, Quereshy HA, Dash S, Grobaty L, Zhou G (2021) Computer-based video training is effective in teaching basic surgical skills to novices without faculty involvement using a self-directed, sequential and incremental program. Am J Surg 221(4):780–787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.08.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Farrow NE, Commander SJ, Reed CR, Mueller JL, Gupta A, Loh AHP, Sekabira J, Fitzgerald TN (2021) Laparoscopic experience and attitudes toward a low-cost laparoscopic system among surgeons in East, Central, and Southern Africa: a survey study. Surg Endosc 35(12):6539–6548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08151-w

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank surgery residents at Soddo Christian Hospital, Ethiopia and Mbingo Baptist Hospital, Cameroon, as well as medical students involved in the Surgery Olympics program at University of Michigan Medical School.

Funding

Christopher W. Reynolds was supported by a grant from the National Institutes of Health during this study (T-35 Short-Term Biomedical Research Training Program). This work was supported by a grant from the Intuitive Foundation in partnership with the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Solve Initiative as part of the Global Surgery Training Challenge.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Grace J. Kim.

Ethics declarations

Disclosure

Mr. Christopher W. Reynolds was supported by a grant from the National Institutes of Health during this study (T-35 Short-Term Biomedical Research Training Program). Dr. Grace J. Kim was supported by a grant from the Intuitive Foundation in partnership with the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Solve Initiative as part of the Global Surgery Training Challenge (no grant number). Drs. Deborah M. Rooney, David R. Jeffcoach, Melanie Barnard, Mark J. Snell, Kevin El-Hayek, Blessing Ngoin Ngam, and John Tanyi and Ms. Serena S. Bidwell, Ms. Chioma Anidi, and Ms. C. Yoonhee Ryder have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Reynolds, C.W., Rooney, D.M., Jeffcoach, D.R. et al. Evidence supporting performance measures of laparoscopic appendectomy through a novel surgical proficiency assessment tool and low-cost laparoscopic training system. Surg Endosc 37, 7170–7177 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10182-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10182-y

Keywords

Profiles

  1. Grace J. Kim