🌐 AI搜瓢 & 代理 主锵
Skip to main content
Account

TableĀ 9 Crime concentration

From: Examining Crime Trajectories at Micro Geographic Locations Across Varied Urban Contexts in the U.S.

Panel A: % of street segments with 60% of violent crime

City

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

Seattle

2.8%

2.8%

2.7%

2.5%

2.4%

2.3%

2.3%

2.4%

2.3%

San Antonio

1.9%

2.1%

1.8%

2.0%

1.9%

1.6%

2.0%

1.9%

1.9%

Memphis

4.9%

5.1%

5.5%

4.9%

5.1%

5.2%

5.4%

5.6%

5.0%

Los Angeles

4.9%

3.7%

3.6%

3.4%

3.4%

4.3%

4.7%

2.9%

2.9%

Scottsdale

0.6%

0.6%

0.5%

0.5%

0.5%

0.5%

0.5%

0.5%

0.5%

Riverside

3.7%

3.3%

3.1%

3.3%

3.0%

2.6%

2.6%

2.8%

2.9%

Minneapolis

4.9%

4.5%

4.7%

4.9%

4.8%

4.7%

4.6%

4.5%

2.7%

Akron

5.8%

6.2%

5.2%

5.4%

4.8%

5.1%

5.0%

5.1%

5.0%

Asheville

1.3%

1.3%

1.1%

1.3%

1.6%

1.3%

1.2%

1.0%

1.5%

Reading

4.3%

4.2%

4.3%

4.0%

4.1%

3.9%

3.5%

3.7%

3.6%

Santa Monica

3.9%

3.5%

2.9%

3.0%

2.4%

3.0%

2.9%

3.3%

2.8%

Diamond Bar

2.1%

1.6%

1.4%

1.1%

1.2%

1.2%

1.3%

0.7%

0.5%

Panel B: % of street segments with 60% of property crime

City

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

Seattle

8.1%

8.1%

7.7%

8.3%

7.7%

7.8%

8.3%

7.2%

7.7%

San Antonio

3.9%

3.7%

6.2%

5.0%

3.0%

2.5%

4.0%

3.4%

3.4%

Memphis

7.5%

7.5%

7.8%

7.2%

7.1%

7.2%

6.9%

6.2%

5.6%

Los Angeles

9.1%

8.7%

8.4%

7.7%

7.2%

9.0%

8.9%

5.3%

5.1%

Scottsdale

2.2%

2.5%

2.4%

2.0%

2.0%

1.6%

1.7%

1.9%

1.8%

Riverside

5.4%

5.3%

5.5%

4.9%

4.4%

4.5%

5.4%

4.8%

4.5%

Minneapolis

9.5%

9.1%

9.1%

8.8%

7.7%

7.8%

8.1%

8.1%

5.7%

Akron

9.7%

10.1%

9.3%

9.1%

8.6%

8.7%

8.3%

8.7%

8.0%

Asheville

4.5%

4.6%

4.6%

4.5%

4.0%

4.5%

4.4%

4.1%

2.1%

Reading

8.8%

8.8%

8.1%

7.2%

6.9%

6.4%

6.9%

6.1%

6.6%

Santa Monica

7.1%

7.4%

7.2%

7.2%

6.9%

6.7%

6.7%

7.1%

6.4%

Diamond Bar

5.1%

4.3%

4.0%

3.9%

3.2%

4.3%

5.8%

4.4%

5.0%