Abstract
Our study investigates the effects of long-duration spaceflight on brain aging in spacefarers using structural MRI and machine learning models. Pre-, post-, and follow-up scans of ROS cosmonauts ESA astronauts, and matched Earth-bounding controls were analyzed. We found a considerable difference between the spacefareres and the control group, especially in the ESA cohorts (ß = 0.63). In the ROS cohorts, we observed a difference between the pre- and post-flight scans. A post-hoc analysis revealed that the pre-flight brain age delta was 0.842 years less than the immediate post-flight brain age delta after long-duration spaceflight. All three machine learning models showed good to excellent intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) between the two consecutive MRI sessions. Our findings suggest that long-duration spaceflight may have an effect on human brain aging as observed from MRI.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The code used for analysis in this manuscript will be made available. However, due to privacy and ethical restrictions, the data itself will not be shared.
References
Van Ombergen, A. et al. Brain ventricular volume changes induced by long-duration spaceflight. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116, 10531–10536 (2019).
Zu Eulenburg, P. et al. Changes in blood biomarkers of brain injury and degeneration following long-duration spaceflight. JAMA Neurol. 78, 1525–1527 (2021).
Van Ombergen, A. et al. Brain tissue-volume changes in cosmonauts. N. Engl. J. Med 379, 1678–1680 (2018).
Barisano, G. et al. The effect of prolonged spaceflight on cerebrospinal fluid and perivascular spaces of astronauts and cosmonauts. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2120439119 (2022).
Lee, A. G. et al. Spaceflight associated neuro-ocular syndrome (SANS) and the neuro-ophthalmologic effects of microgravity: A review and an update. NPJ Microgravity 6, 7 (2020).
Cumplido-Mayoral, I. et al. Biological brain age prediction using machine learning on structural neuroimaging data: Multi-cohort validation against biomarkers of Alzheimer’s disease and neurodegeneration stratified by sex. Elife 12 https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.81067 (2023).
Han, L. K. M. et al. Brain aging in major depressive disorder: results from the ENIGMA major depressive disorder working group. Mol. Psychiatry 26, 5124–5139 (2021).
Mishra, S., Beheshti, I. & Khanna, P. A review of neuroimaging-driven brain age estimation for identification of brain disorders and health conditions. IEEE Rev. Biomed. Eng. 16, 371–385 (2023).
Elliott, M. L. et al. Brain-age in midlife is associated with accelerated biological aging and cognitive decline in a longitudinal birth cohort. Mol. Psychiatry 26, 3829–3838 (2021).
Franke, K. & Gaser, C. Ten years of BrainAGE as a neuroimaging biomarker of brain aging: What insights have we gained?. Front Neurol. 10, 789 (2019).
Hahn, T. et al. An uncertainty-aware, shareable, and transparent neural network architecture for brain-age modeling. Sci. Adv. 8, eabg9471 (2022).
More, S. et al. Brain-age prediction: A systematic comparison of machine learning workflows. Neuroimage 270, 119947 (2023).
Dartora, C. et al. A deep learning model for brain age prediction using minimally preprocessed T1w images as input. Front Aging Neurosci. 15, 1303036 (2023).
Koo, T. K. & Li, M. Y. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J. Chiropr. Med. 15, 155–163 (2016).
Capri, M. et al. Long-term human spaceflight and inflammaging: Does it promote aging?. Ageing Res Rev. 87, 101909 (2023).
Strollo, F., Gentile, S., Strollo, G., Mambro, A. & Vernikos, J. Recent progress in space physiology and aging. Front Physiol. 9, 1551 (2018).
Nwanaji-Enwerem, J. C. et al. A longitudinal epigenetic aging and leukocyte analysis of simulated space travel: The Mars-500 mission. Cell Rep. 33, 108406 (2020).
Kramer, L. A. et al. Intracranial effects of microgravity: A prospective longitudinal MRI study. Radiology 295, 640–648 (2020).
Van Ombergen, A. et al. The effect of spaceflight and microgravity on the human brain. J. Neurol. 264, 18–22 (2017).
Bethlehem, R. A. I. et al. Brain charts for the human lifespan. Nature 604, 525–533 (2022).
Dintica, C. S. et al. Long-term depressive symptoms and midlife brain age. J. Affect Disord. 320, 436–441 (2023).
Hedderich, D. M. et al. Increased brain age gap estimate (BrainAGE) in young adults after premature birth. Front Aging Neurosci. 13, 653365 (2021).
Marshall-Goebel, K., Damani, R. & Bershad, E. M. Brain physiological response and adaptation during spaceflight. Neurosurgery 85, E815–E821 (2019).
Dorfel, R. P. et al. Prediction of brain age using structural magnetic resonance imaging: A comparison of accuracy and test-retest reliability of publicly available software packages. Hum. Brain Mapp. 44, 6139–6148 (2023).
Jirsaraie, R. J. et al. Benchmarking the generalizability of brain age models: Challenges posed by scanner variance and prediction bias. Hum Brain Mapp https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.26144 (2022).
Walhovd, K. B., Lovden, M. & Fjell, A. M. Timing of lifespan influences on brain and cognition. Trends Cogn. Sci. 27, 901–915 (2023).
Shrout, P. E. & Fleiss, J. L. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol. Bull. 86, 420–428 (1979).
Weir, J. P. Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. J. Strength Cond. Res 19, 231–240 (2005).
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B. & Walker, S. Fitting linear mixed-effects models Using lme4. J. Stat. Softw. 67, 48 (2015).
Lenth, R. V. Least-Squares Means: TheRPackagelsmeans. J. Stat. Softw. 69 https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v069.i01 (2016).
Nicholson, K. J., Sherman, M., Divi, S. N., Bowles, D. R. & Vaccaro, A. R. The role of family-wise error rate in determining statistical significance. Clin. Spine Surg. 35, 222–223 (2022).
Rubin, M. Do p values lose their meaning in exploratory analyses? it depends how you define the familywise error rate. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 21, 269–275 (2017).
Acknowledgements
We thank all cosmonauts, astronauts, and volunteers for their participation. This work was supported by the Belgian Science Policy Prodex, European Space Agency (ESA) (ISLRA 2009-1062 to F.W.), Russian Academy of Sciences (FMFR-2024-0033), and the Research Foundation Flanders (FWO Vlaanderen to A.V.O.). This work was also supported by the German Aerospace Centre (DLR) on behalf of the Federal Ministry of Economics and Technology/Energy (50WB2027 to P.z.E.), the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, PA 3634/1-1 to K.P. and EI 816/21-1 to S.E.), and the Helmholtz Portfolio Theme “Supercomputing and Modelling for the Human Brain” (to K.P.).
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
G.T. and P.z.E. conceptualised the study and led the manuscript writing. They, along with K.P., F.H., and S.M., conducted the data analysis. The remaining co-authors contributed to data collection, provided critical feedback, and helped shape the research.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
A.V.O. is an Associate Editor of npj Microgravity. The authors declare no other competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Tang, G., Patil, K.R., Hoffstaedter, F. et al. Longitudinal brain-age predictions comprising long-duration spaceflight missions. npj Microgravity (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41526-026-00575-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41526-026-00575-3
- Springer Nature Limited