🌐 AI搜索 & 代理 主页
Skip to content

chore(release): 29.4.6 #5146

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
ahnpnl merged 1 commit into from
Dec 1, 2025
Merged

chore(release): 29.4.6 #5146

ahnpnl merged 1 commit into from
Dec 1, 2025
+18 −9

Conversation

@ahnpnl
Copy link
Collaborator

@ahnpnl ahnpnl commented Dec 1, 2025 •
edited by coderabbitai bot
Loading

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Fixed hybrid module logging behavior to display warnings instead of failing tests.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@ahnpnl ahnpnl requested a review from kulshekhar as a code owner December 1, 2025 16:35
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 1, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Walkthrough

This PR releases version 29.4.6, updating the package version and CHANGELOG to document a bug fix where hybrid modules are now logged as warnings instead of causing test failures, addressing issue #5144.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Release and version management
CHANGELOG.md, package.json		 Added release entry 29.4.6 (2025-12-01) documenting bug fix for hybrid module logging behavior; bumped package version from 29.4.5 to 29.4.6

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

  • chore(release): 29.4.4 #5051: Prior release churn PR that similarly updates CHANGELOG.md and bumps package.json version for an earlier release (29.4.4).

Suggested reviewers

  • kulshekhar

Poem

🐰 A version hops forth, twenty-nine-four-six,
With warnings now gentle where tests wouldn't fix,
The hybrid logs softer, no failures in sight,
A patch-ity bounty, release-day delight! ✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title 'chore(release): 29.4.6' clearly and specifically identifies the pull request as a release version bump to 29.4.6, matching the changes shown in both CHANGELOG.md and package.json.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch release-29-4-6
📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 528d37c and 53b76c3.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
  • package.json (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (3)
📓 Common learnings 
Learnt from: ahnpnl
Repo: kulshekhar/ts-jest PR: 4976
File: examples/js-with-babel/package.json:14-19
Timestamp: 2025-08-05T08:03:52.583Z
Learning: ts-jest version 29 supports both Jest 29 and Jest 30, so having ts-jest 29.x with Jest 30.x is not a compatibility issue and should not be flagged as a version mismatch problem.
📚 Learning: 2025-08-05T08:03:52.583Z 
Learnt from: ahnpnl
Repo: kulshekhar/ts-jest PR: 4976
File: examples/js-with-babel/package.json:14-19
Timestamp: 2025-08-05T08:03:52.583Z
Learning: ts-jest version 29 supports both Jest 29 and Jest 30, so having ts-jest 29.x with Jest 30.x is not a compatibility issue and should not be flagged as a version mismatch problem.

Applied to files:

  • package.json
  • CHANGELOG.md
📚 Learning: 2025-07-21T14:09:03.234Z 
Learnt from: ahnpnl
Repo: kulshekhar/ts-jest PR: 4950
File: .github/actions/setup-workspace/action.yml:28-28
Timestamp: 2025-07-21T14:09:03.234Z
Learning: In the ts-jest project, dependencies are only installed at the root level using the root package-lock.json file. Subdirectory package-lock.json files in e2e/ and examples/ directories don't affect the main workspace dependency installation, so they should not be included in GitHub Actions cache keys for the main workspace.

Applied to files:

  • package.json
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (6)
  • GitHub Check: test-windows (22) / Run tests on Node v22 on windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: test-windows (20) / Run tests on Node v20 on windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: test-windows (18) / Run tests on Node v18 on windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: test-ubuntu (22) / Run tests on Node v22 on ubuntu-latest
  • GitHub Check: test-ubuntu (20) / Run tests on Node v20 on ubuntu-latest
  • GitHub Check: test-ubuntu (18) / Run tests on Node v18 on ubuntu-latest
🔇 Additional comments (2)
package.json (1)

3-3: Version bump looks correct.

Patch version increment from 29.4.5 to 29.4.6 is appropriate for a bug fix release.

CHANGELOG.md (1)

1-9: CHANGELOG entry is well-formatted and complete.

The release entry correctly documents the bug fix with version, date, issue references, and commit hash in conventional-changelog format.

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Dec 1, 2025

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

@ahnpnl ahnpnl merged commit 202bde5 into main Dec 1, 2025
21 checks passed
@ahnpnl ahnpnl deleted the release-29-4-6 branch December 1, 2025 17:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@kulshekhar kulshekhar kulshekhar approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@ahnpnl @kulshekhar