🌐 AI搜索 & 代理 主页
Skip to content

Conversation

@anntzer
Copy link
Contributor

@anntzer anntzer commented Jul 30, 2019

  • 1d transforms are always separable, no need to repeat is_separable = True again and again.
  • If a subclass overrides inverted() then it is most likely invertible
    (though not always), no need to repeat has_inverse = True again and
    again (but subclasses can always override to has_inverse = False).

PR Summary

PR Checklist

  • Has Pytest style unit tests
  • Code is Flake 8 compliant
  • New features are documented, with examples if plot related
  • Documentation is sphinx and numpydoc compliant
  • Added an entry to doc/users/next_whats_new/ if major new feature (follow instructions in README.rst there)
  • Documented in doc/api/api_changes.rst if API changed in a backward-incompatible way

@tacaswell tacaswell added this to the v3.2.0 milestone Aug 5, 2019
@tacaswell
Copy link
Member

How often do we check these in the code, iirc the the performance cost of properties over attribute access is sizable.

@tacaswell
Copy link
Member

This actually seems like a good case for __init_subclass__....

@anntzer
Copy link
Contributor Author

anntzer commented Aug 5, 2019

Good point re __init_subclass__, now implemented, which should also handle any worries about performance cost.

- :attr:`is_separable`
- :attr:`has_inverse`
- :meth:`inverted` (if :attr:`has_inverse` is True)
- :attr:`is_separable` (defaults to True for 1d -> 1d transforms)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Subclasses of this class should override the following members (at minimum):

Is not correct anymore for is_separable and has_inverse. Either rephrase or put those two in a separate block.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

good point, done

- 1d transforms are always separable, no need to repeat `is_separable =
  True` again and again.
- If a subclass overrides `inverted()` then it is most likely invertible
  (though not always), no need to repeat `has_inverse = True` again and
  again (but subclasses can always override to `has_inverse = False`).
@timhoffm timhoffm merged commit 3670867 into matplotlib:master Aug 5, 2019
@anntzer anntzer deleted the tprop branch August 5, 2019 16:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants