MNT: Reduce the use of get_xticklabels() in examples #29602
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Mecanerd
reviewed
Feb 27, 2025
replace with tick_params() where possible.
b558d2a to
1746d11
Compare
QuLogic
approved these changes
Mar 1, 2025
Co-authored-by: Elliott Sales de Andrade <quantum.analyst@gmail.com>
dstansby
approved these changes
Mar 8, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Working towards #29594. In particular, usage of
tick_params()is superior in that it's an axis-wide setting that is applied to new/changed ticks. In contrast, manipulating volatile tick instances may result in inconsistency if the plot is further modified afterwards.Note this needs the new text rotation mode "xtick" and is thus targeted at 3.11.