DOC: Clarify restrictions on GenAI usage #30761
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
- Use bullet points to explicitly separate the areas comments/discussion and code. - Be very explicit that contributions require adding personal value. - Explicitly state that we can reject low-value AI content. I've added this, so that we can friendly but firmly discard contributions with a sentence like "This contributions looks purely AI generated and does not comply with our [policy on AI usage](link)"
rcomer
approved these changes
Nov 18, 2025
Member
rcomer
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It's like you read my mind! Approving but leaving unmerged so others can comment.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
With this being clearer, I hope we'll also have less of a struggle of wording the top-level statement on AI in #30699.