🌐 AI搜索 & 代理 主页
Skip to content

Conversation

@eggrobin
Copy link
Member

@eggrobin eggrobin commented Aug 15, 2024

Needed to test #885.
The strings are considered only as property values, their properties (whatever that means) are not looked at.

Copy link
Member

@macchiati macchiati left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Only minor comments

+ ")",
pp.getIndex());
}
if (set.hasStrings() && set.strings().size() != set.size()) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That would also change this to the easier to read:

            if (set.codePointsSize() > 0 && set.strings().size() > 0) {

macchiati
macchiati previously approved these changes Sep 5, 2024
@eggrobin eggrobin merged commit addf0c9 into unicode-org:main Sep 6, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants