🌐 AI搜索 & 代理 主页
Skip to content

Conversation

@fisker
Copy link
Contributor

@fisker fisker commented Nov 23, 2025

PR Checklist

Overview

The syntax check should always check against TS node instead of ESTree node before convert, prepare for #11695

VariableStatement check also checking against ESTree node, but it's quite complex, will give another try in seperate PR.

@typescript-eslint
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the PR, @fisker!

typescript-eslint is a 100% community driven project, and we are incredibly grateful that you are contributing to that community.

The core maintainers work on this in their personal time, so please understand that it may not be possible for them to review your work immediately.

Thanks again!


🙏 Please, if you or your company is finding typescript-eslint valuable, help us sustain the project by sponsoring it transparently on https://opencollective.com/typescript-eslint.

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Nov 23, 2025

Deploy Preview for typescript-eslint ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 0603fcb
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/typescript-eslint/deploys/6922a7a6adbced0008fa169e
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-11777--typescript-eslint.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.
Lighthouse
Lighthouse
1 paths audited
Performance: 92 (🔴 down 5 from production)
Accessibility: 97 (no change from production)
Best Practices: 100 (no change from production)
SEO: 92 (no change from production)
PWA: 80 (no change from production)
View the detailed breakdown and full score reports

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

@nx-cloud
Copy link

nx-cloud bot commented Nov 23, 2025

View your CI Pipeline Execution ↗ for commit 0603fcb

Command Status Duration Result
nx test eslint-plugin --coverage=false ✅ Succeeded 5m 16s View ↗
nx run-many -t lint ✅ Succeeded 3m 18s View ↗
nx run-many -t typecheck ✅ Succeeded 2m 11s View ↗
nx test typescript-estree --coverage=false ✅ Succeeded 20s View ↗
nx test eslint-plugin-internal --coverage=false ✅ Succeeded 9s View ↗
nx run integration-tests:test ✅ Succeeded 6s View ↗
nx run types:build ✅ Succeeded 5s View ↗
nx run generate-configs ✅ Succeeded 6s View ↗
Additional runs (29) ✅ Succeeded ... View ↗

☁️ Nx Cloud last updated this comment at 2025-11-23 06:31:54 UTC

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 23, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 75.00000% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 90.57%. Comparing base (c421d30) to head (0603fcb).
⚠️ Report is 23 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
packages/typescript-estree/src/convert.ts 75.00% 2 Missing ⚠️

❌ Your patch status has failed because the patch coverage (75.00%) is below the target coverage (90.00%). You can increase the patch coverage or adjust the target coverage.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main   #11777   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   90.57%   90.57%           
=======================================
  Files         522      522           
  Lines       53079    53076    -3     
  Branches     8842     8842           
=======================================
  Hits        48074    48074           
+ Misses       4989     4987    -2     
+ Partials       16       15    -1     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittest 90.57% <75.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
packages/typescript-estree/src/convert.ts 31.10% <75.00%> (+0.03%) ⬆️
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Copy link
Member

@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks!

@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg added the 1 approval >=1 team member has approved this PR; we're now leaving it open for more reviews before we merge label Nov 24, 2025
@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg merged commit f8b2bb4 into typescript-eslint:main Dec 1, 2025
70 of 71 checks passed
@fisker fisker deleted the VariableDeclaration-check branch December 1, 2025 14:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

1 approval >=1 team member has approved this PR; we're now leaving it open for more reviews before we merge

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants